I have an abstract base class for a pointAccumulator. This abstract base will be filled out with methods such as a function that returns mean of all the points. An example of these two classes is shown below:
class lala {
public:
virtual someFunctions = 0;
virtual bool isEmpty() = 0;
};
class lalaLower : public lala {
public:
lalaLower(){}
~lalaLower(){}
someFunctions
template<class Archive> void serialize(Archive & ar, const unsigned int version) {
ar & heights_;
}
protected:
std::deque<double> heights_;
};
As you can see in the code I would also like to use boost serialization in to save these types. Now using a factory pattern i believe that you call the pointAccumulator types like this:
lala *a1 = new lalaLower();
My problem is that the templated serialize method will not be accessible if I call it this way. Also I cannot have the templated class in the abstract class as this is not allowed by c++. Is there a way to get around this?
Edit:
I have considered the non-intrusive method for serialization but that requires heights_ to be public which is not ideal, nor is it good programming style. I thought potentially a method using friend classes or functions could penetrate the class with access to the variables while still keeping the base class abstract? can anyone explain how this would work?
I think using friend classes or functions is a good solution, you could add new class like Serializor
here is a example of friend function
class Serializor;
class meanAccumulator : public pointAccumulator
{
public:
meanAccumulator(){}
~meanAccumulator(){}
double getHeight();
void addHeight(double Height);
void setHeight(double Height);
bool isEmpty(){ return heights_.empty(); }
protected: std::deque<double> heights_;
friend int Serializor::Func1( Serializor& );
};
refer to http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ahhw8bzz.aspx